About

My name is Omar TAKY-EDDINE. I graduated from the faculty of education in 2012, and I'm currently a Master students at the faculty of IBN ZOHR, Agadir. The master is entitled teaching English as a foreign language and information communication technology. This blog aims at giving you a view on the issues we study in the master program; basically some of the writings which I produced in the first semester. Your comments are very much welcomed.
Sunday, January 27, 2013


There are a number of theories which tried to describe how learning is taking place and how teaching should be like. Two of the major theories that made a revolution in the field of educational psychology are Behavioral and social learning theories. So what are the main principles of these theories? And what are their shortcomings?

 
Behaviorism is a psychological theory founded by J B Watson. It appeared in the US as a new approach to the study of psychological phenomena in the early 1920s. It is a psychological theory which views language just like any other human behaviour; conditioning is the basic learning principle, thus Learning becomes a process of habit formation. Classical and operant conditioning are two central concepts to behavioral psychology. As far as Classical conditioning is concerned, Learning occurs a result of associating a stimulus with a specific response. Through repetition, the association between stimulus and response becomes automatic. Once this automatic process is established, learning of a new habit takes place. Regarding Operant conditioning by Skinner; Learning occurs as a function of reinforcement: reward (positive behavior), or Punishment (negative behavior).Learning therefore takes place when good habits are rewarded whereas bad ones are ‘punished’.
On the other hand, Albert Bandura is known for his social learning theory (SLT). The latter posits that people learn from one another via observation, imitation, and modeling. This theory has often been called a bridge between behaviorist and cognitive learning theories because it encompasses attention, memory, and motivation. Bandora criticized the Skinnerian emphasis on the effects of the consequences of the behavior. Unlike the behaviorist appraoch, Bandura stated that much of human learning takes place through observation of and sensorial experiences with models. Modeling is deemed the key to learning because children want to be and act like the model. Bandura's analysis of observational learning involves four phases: Attention phase, Retaining phase, Production, and Motivation phase. Attention refers to how a person perceives which person to observe and what aspects of behavior to observe. Retention indicates the process of remembering what has been seen and storing it in memory. On the other hand, Production phase brings to light the process by which a person physically acts out the behavior they have remembered. Whereas the Motivation phase revolves around the idea that we may acquire new skill through observation, but may not perform it until there is motivation or incentives to do so.
Because there no theory that can be deemed as perfect or thorough, it would be worthwhile to shed light on the shortcomings of the two theories mentioned above. Let's start with behaviorism; one should admit that the behaviourist view offers a partial explanation of some aspects of children’s early language learning. Notwithstanding, behaviourism has been under a fierce criticism from many psychologists. Part of the criticism is that behaviourist theory failed to recognize the creativity of human minds. Children pick out patterns and then generalize them to new contexts. They create new forms or new uses of words until they finally figure out how the forms are used by adults. Furthermore, the rate of imitation may be less than 10% for some children but 30% or 40% for others. In other words, children don't imitate everything they hear. One the other hand, criticism that social learning theory received was mainly as a reaction to the laboratory studies of imitation on which Bandura based his theory. One criticism is that it does not take into account individual differences or social context. For example, we often find people brought up together but the way they act is very different. Criticism was also due to the idea that students learn best as passive receivers of sensory stimuli, as opposed to being active learners.
One way to reconcile the behaviourist and social learning theories is to see that each one of them may help to explain a different aspect of children’s development. Behaviourism gives us explanations on how human behaviour is developed. It also explains the acquisition of vocabulary and grammatical morphemes. On the other hand; social learning explanations may be useful for Explaining the role of social influence from the media, peers and parents. It also covers a wider range of explanations such as the importance of cognitive factors rather than suggesting we have no control.
Omar Taky-Eddine






.